Unfortunately for us, we have a health minister who refuses to listen to any concerns from medical professionals about any of the issues constantly being raised by experienced doctors and nurses. Without any medical training, apparently Mr Snelling knows best and will continue to trot out the same spin as fed to him by his many spin doctors. 
IAN
Yes we know the system doesn't work to the satisfaction of many. So who specified EPAS? Who designed it? Who built it? Who tested it? Who trained the users? Who is responsible? Why does the taxpayer continue to have to pay more and more for a "contracted" system? Or is it the usual resistance to change?
PETER
Alas, given the time and money invested to date, there is no way they are going to acknowledge the disaster this is, nor will the chief architect ever assume responsibility.
Staff will therefore be forced to use it and "make it work effectively" following which the perpetrators will announce:"see, we told you it would work OK!" The sad thing is they did exactly the same thing with OACIS. DIANNE
Well that puts a lot of confidence in the new RAH. A system that could kill you. I'll be concerned if I ever need to be a patient.
DANIELLE
Sounds to me like the staff using the system are using "passive aggressive" behaviour to scrap a system that will root out the errors they currently don't declare. They claim they are kept busy on screens instead of handling critical clinical situations. Then perhaps they need to get their priorities straight and deal with the paperwork afterwards, just like they do when they are running the existing error-prone paper-based systems.
TONY
Yet again the promoters of the system insist (in the face of documented expert advice) that the system is better than reality suggests and expect us to accept it. Unfortunately we do.MARLEY