The release of a searchable database for the Panama Papers on Tuesday has triggered a global hunt for clients of Panama law firm Mossack Fonseca, highlighting one area where Australia tops the world. 
It may be filed under the heading "Look, We Have No Lawyers". We're also pretty short on accountants.
Australia has the world's smallest number of Mossack Fonseca intermediaries. No one here wants to be a MossFon middle man.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists opened the data base, based on material obtained by German newspaper SÃ¼ddeutsche Zeitung, which allowed searches of more than 200,000 companies and shareholders set up in 21 tax havens around the world.
Whereas China lists 40,000 intermediaries feeding their clients into Mossack Fonseca, the Australian total list of intermediaries is just 123.
This number includes almost all the major law firms, including Malleson Stephen Jaques, Freehill Hollingdale Page and Allens Arthur Robinson, but the accounts are decades old and have been suspended a long since.
Only six law firms are listed as active clients, but even these are doubtful.
After the Wickenby international tax investigation that began in 2004, new Australian laws have targeted tax promoters and administrators, making them responsible if their clients avoid tax.
There are many legitimate reasons to set up shell companies in low-tax jurisdictions, but Australian law firms are understandably reluctant to be listed as administrators.
When Mossack Fonseca asked for due diligence documents from Ataskovic Hartnell in 2008 in regard to its work for the Oberoi hotel group, the law firm made it clear that, while it was providing some legal advice to Oberoi, it was not the administrator.
After PKF Australia introduced a client to Mossack Fonseca in 2012, it stressed: "PKF never requested services, we merely acted as a contact point until [Mossack Fonseca] met the clients."
ICIJ searches have identified 1266 shareholders of Mossack Fonseca companies with an Australian address, though this is far from the total of all Australian clients.
Of these, 204 are bearer shares that are difficult to track. Another 230 shareholders are trusts and private companies, leaving 792 individual shareholdings (which includes people linked to more than one company).
Tuesday's release also highlights Mossack Fonseca's huge client base in China, where the Panamanian firm operates eight offices.
The ICIJ has identified 23,600 Mossack Fonseca shareholders with addresses in China and 15,400 in Hong Kong. Chinese names make up 21 per cent of Australian addresses of shareholders.
In another measure, in 2015 Mossack Fonseca generated a list of 22,615 client passports it held. Of these, 250 were Australian, 488 were American, 1303 British, 1815 Hong Kong and 4378 Chinese.
These numbers, incomplete as they are, suggest Chinese make up more than a quarter of Mossack Fonseca's clients, reflecting the huge economic growth that has taken place.
Much of this growth in China has been in recent years.
When factored against the fall off of Mossack Fonseca's older clients dating back to the 1970s, the current proportion of Chinese clients may be significantly higher.